MyPlace

PROJECT IN PROGRESS

Design and structuring of MyPlace, a platform and LMS designed to centralise AFDAS services and improve access to information for various user profiles. The project involved structuring multi-profile pathways, clarifying the information architecture, and designing consistent interfaces in order to improve legibility, seamless usage, and platform adoption.

MyPlace

PROJECT IN PROGRESS

Design and structuring of MyPlace, a platform and LMS designed to centralise AFDAS services and improve access to information for various user profiles. The project involved structuring multi-profile pathways, clarifying the information architecture, and designing consistent interfaces in order to improve legibility, seamless usage, and platform adoption.

CLIENT

Afdas

Service

UX/UI Design

Role

UX/UI Lead

CLIENT

Afdas

Service

UX/UI Design

Role

UX/UI Lead

CLIENT

Afdas

Service

UX/UI Design

Role

UX/UI Lead

Platform screens
Platform screens

Context

Context

Understanding the Ecosystem

MyPlace is a platform currently being developed for Afdas, the skills operator for the culture, creative industries, media and leisure sectors.

It aims to centralise access to vocational training and simplify interactions between the different actors in the system: beneficiaries, member companies, training providers and Afdas administrators.

Prior to MyPlace, these actors had to navigate between multiple tools and administrative processes to search for, manage or publish training, resulting in a fragmented and complex experience.

The objective of the project is therefore to design a unified platform to streamline access, management and monitoring of training.

Home screen

Issues

Issues

Different needs for different stakeholders

The platform must meet the needs of several types of users, each with specific objectives and pathways:

  • Beneficiaries, wishing to discover and follow training courses

  • Employees of member companies, accessing the training courses offered

  • Companies, seeking to monitor the progress of their employees

  • Training organisations, responsible for creating and managing educational content

  • Afdas administrators, responsible for validating and supervising training courses

This diversity of stakeholders requires the design of a product capable of structuring interconnected pathways while ensuring a simple and clear experience for everyone.

User profiles

Journey mapping

Journey mapping

Understanding Interactions

Based on user interviews and discussions with the Afdas teams, we mapped out the various journeys to better understand the interactions between the platform's actors.

This step helped to:

  • Visualise the key steps of the training journey

  • Identify points of dependency between the different profiles

  • Highlight the complexity of flows related to validations and content management

The platform must therefore support several main journeys:

  • Search for and discover training courses

  • Consult programmes and educational content

  • Apply for or register for a training course

  • Track the progress of a training course

  • Manage and publish educational content

User journey - Public profile

Platform architecture

Platform architecture

Structuring a multi-role product

In view of the diversity of stakeholders involved, the design of MyPlace required defining a clear architecture to organise functionalities according to user roles.

Each profile needed to access only the features corresponding to their needs while remaining integrated within a common ecosystem.

The platform is thus structured around several main areas:

  • Training catalogue allowing for the discovery of programmes

  • Training space dedicated to monitoring training courses and pedagogical content

  • Dashboards to track activity and progress

  • Administration interfaces designed for the management and validation of content

Insights

Insights

Identify friction points

The analysis of user paths, combined with interviews conducted with the various profiles and discussions with the Afdas teams, highlighted several major friction points.

A fragmented experience

Users had to navigate between multiple tools and interfaces to accomplish a single task, making the paths long and confusing.

A lack of visibility on statuses

Both beneficiaries and companies had difficulty understanding the progress status of requests (registration, validation, follow-up), generating uncertainty.

Strong dependencies between actors

The paths rely on interactions between several profiles (organisations, Afdas, companies), creating blockages and delays when certain stages are not clearly identified.

Significant administrative complexity

The processes related to training (validation, publication, follow-up) involve many steps, which are often perceived as cumbersome and unintuitive.

Heterogeneous needs depending on profiles

Each actor has different objectives, making it difficult to design an experience that is both complete and simple.

Wireframes

Wireframes

Translating insights into solutions

Based on the identified issues, we designed initial solutions aimed at simplifying user journeys and clarifying interactions between the different stakeholders.

The goal was to offer an experience that was:

  • more seamless

  • more legible

  • tailored to each profile

This phase resulted in the design of wireframes to structure the key screens and journeys of the platform.

Structuring the main journeys

Several key journeys were defined and prioritised:

  • Search for and discover a training course

  • View a detailed programme

  • Register or submit a request

  • Track the progress of a training course

  • Manage and publish educational content

These journeys served as the basis for designing a consistent and cohesive experience across the platform.

Platform mockups

Interface & UI

Interface & UI

Different interfaces according to roles

Each type of user has an interface suited to their needs:

  • beneficiaries access a space focused on discovery and monitoring

  • companies have management dashboards

  • training organisations manage their educational content

  • Afdas administrators supervise and validate training sessions

Overall visual consistency

Despite the diversity of the interfaces, particular attention was paid to:

  • consistency of components

  • readability of information

  • simplicity of interactions

Platform screens